Laparoscopic versus abdominal hysterectomy in the treatment of endometrial cancer.
نویسندگان
چکیده
Up until 20 years ago, laparotomy was the single method of surgical treatment for endometrial cancer. Wider acceptance for the laparoscopic approach has been gained by gynecologic surgeons as an alternative surgical method. Clinical application of laparoscopic surgery has grown rapidly, yet it remains to be proven if this technique has brought great benefits. The location of minimal-access surgery in gynecologic oncology has proven effective particularly with the growth of exchanged experience among surgeons. As operative laparoscopy in gynecologic oncology remains novel, the potentiality of the procedure is underscored. In this review, we survey the literature on this technique and critically evaluate the indications, limitations, as well as the benefits and risks of this approach to hysterectomy. Due regard should be given certain patients with indications for an abdominal hysterectomy to the benefits that laparoscopic hysterectomy may offer.
منابع مشابه
Laparoscopic treatment of endometrial cancer: feasibility and results.
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to compare laparoscopic and abdominal approach in the treatment of endometrial cancer in our department. STUDY DESIGN From January 1999 to November 2002, 77 patients underwent surgery for stages I-III endometrial cancer. The first group of 36 patients had abdominal hysterectomy as well as salpingo-oophorectomy, with or without lymphadenectomy. The remaining...
متن کاملDifferences in Epidural and Analgesic Use in Patients with Apparent Stage I Endometrial Cancer Treated by Open versus Laparoscopic Surgery: Results from the Randomised LACE Trial
Objectives. We compared postoperative analgesic requirements between women with early stage endometrial cancer treated by total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) or total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH). Methods. 760 patients with apparent stage I endometrial cancer were treated in the international, multicentre, prospective randomised trial (LACE) by TAH (n = 353) or TLH (n = 407) (2005-2010). Epid...
متن کاملTotal laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy for endometrial cancer: a meta-analysis.
The standard surgery for early-stage endometrial cancer is total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH), while total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) is less invasive and assumed to be associated with lower morbidity. This meta- analysis was performed to investigate the effects of TLH versus TAH in women with early-stage endometrial cancer. We searched the PubMed, EMBASE, CBM and Cochrane Review databases...
متن کاملRobotic Assisted, Total Laparoscopic, and Total Abdominal Hysterectomy for Management of Uterine Cancer.
OBJECTIVES The purpose was to compare robotic assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TRH), laparoscopic assisted hysterectomy (TLH) and total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) with surgical staging +/- lymphadenectomy for the management of uterine cancer. METHODS Institutional review board approval was obtained and patient characteristics, pathologic data, and data related to the surgical proce...
متن کاملThe cost-effectiveness of total laparoscopic hysterectomy compared to total abdominal hysterectomy for the treatment of early stage endometrial cancer
OBJECTIVE To summarise how costs and health benefits will change with the adoption of total laparoscopic hysterectomy compared to total abdominal hysterectomy for the treatment of early stage endometrial cancer. DESIGN Cost-effectiveness modelling using the information from a randomised controlled trial. PARTICIPANTS Two hypothetical modelled cohorts of 1000 individuals undergoing total lap...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Saudi medical journal
دوره 34 1 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2013